Differential nuclease sensitivity profiling uncovers a drought responsive change in maize leaf chromatin structure for two large retrotransposon derivatives, Uloh and Vegu.

Plant chromatin dynamics are generally recognized as playing a role in the genomic response to environmental stress. Although stress-induced transcriptional activities of LTR-retrotransposons have been reported, whether the stress response can be detected at the level of chromatin structure for LTR-retrotransposons is largely unknown. Using differential nuclease sensitivity profiling, we identified that two out of 29 maize LTR-retrotransposon families change their chromatin structure in response to drought stress in leaf tissue. The two LTR-retrotransposon families, uloh and vegu, are classified as nonautonomous LTR-retrotransposons. Differently from other families, the chromatin structure of these two families shifted from more open in normal conditions to more closed following drought stress. Although uloh and vegu lack sequence similarity, most of them shared an intriguing feature of having a new and uncharacterized insertion of a DNA sequence near one side of an LTR. In the uloh family, nine members with a strong drought response also exhibited a drought-induced reduction of published H3K4me3 histone modification in the inserted DNA region, implicating this modification in the chromatin structural changes. Our results provide new insight into how LTR-retrotransposons can alter their chromatin structure following stress response in plants.

Reclamation of acid sulfate soils using lime-stabilized biosolids.

Excavation of sulfidic materials during construction has resulted in acid rock drainage (ARD) problems throughout Virginia. The most extensive documented uncontrolled disturbance at a single location is Stafford Regional Airport (SRAP) in Stafford, Virginia. Beginning in 1998, over 150 ha of sulfidic Coastal Plain sediments were disturbed, including steeply sloping cut surfaces and spoils placed into fills. Acid sulfate soils developed, and ARD generated on-site degraded metal and concrete structures and heavily damaged water quality with effects noted over 1 km downstream. The site was not recognized as sulfidic until 2001 when surface soil sampling revealed pH values ranging from 1.9 to 5.3 and peroxide potential acidity (PPA) values ranging from 1 to 42 Mg CaCO(3) per 1000 Mg material. In February 2002 a water quality program was established in and around the site to monitor baseline pH, EC, NO(3)-N, NH(4)-N, PO(4)-P, Fe, Al, Mn, and SO(4)-S, and initial pH values as low as 2.9 were noted in on-site receiving streams. In the spring and fall of 2002, the site was treated with variable rates of lime-stabilized biosolids, straw-mulch, and acid- and salt-tolerant legumes and grasses. By October 2002, the site was fully revegetated (> or = 90% living cover) with the exception of a few highly acidic outcrops and seepage areas. Surface soil sampling in 2003, 2004, and 2006 revealed pH values typically > 6.0. Water quality responded quickly to treatment, although short-term NH(4)(+) release occurred. Despite heavy loadings, no significant surface water P losses were observed.